1-905-844-4247 10am-3pm EST

Your Email Marketing Questions Answered FAST!

20
Mar

These two Email Service Providers (ESPs) are as different as they can be.

Aweber is primarily an auto-responder service, enewsletter service second. To take advantage of all its features, you really need to be familiar with some Internet technologies, such as HTML, FTP and RSS.

If your intention is to self-publish a company newsletter, then Constant Contact is a better choice (not the best choice, though, but read on). They have an extensive library of ezine templates which can be customized relatively easily. CC provides hosting space for a small number of images, and more can be purchased. Aweber does not offer image hosting, so images need to be uploaded to your web site or blog - by FTP, for example.

When sending HTML emails, such as newsletters and e-flyers, it is advisable to also send a plain text version along with it, for people who prefer to read text-only emails, or their email programs don’t support HTML, or HTML is blocked by the company firewall. If you’re using one of Constant Contact’s many templates, the system generates the TXT version for you. With Aweber you need to manually create the TXT version which can become tedious quickly. However, a tool such as Premailer can help with that, however your HTML ezine needs to be hosted on your web site for this tool to work.

If you plan to publish several different email newsletters, and collect subscribers online, then Aweber provides an easier way, as you can have separate sign up forms for each list (newsletter). Aweber also offers pop up sign up forms, which have been proved to be very effective. Also, in terms of user experience during the sign up process, Aweber offers more choices as you can direct subscribers to different pages on your site, for example to deliver a sign up bonus or freebie.

Constant Contact would be a better choice if you already have an existing list of subscribers, or clients, which you can import into your account. Ideally you would import only people you know would be interested in receiving your newsletters, and have given you permission (either electronically or in person). When importing any number of contacts into an Awber account they are automatically sent a so-called “confirmation” email. This email contains a link each individual contact must click to give you permission to send them additional messages. This process can sometimes decimate your list, even ones which contain previously confirmed contacts. With Constant Contact, it’s up to you if you want to send your contacts this message, or you can confirm them “softly” over time, by including a “reminder” at the top of each email you send them. When a confirmation message is sent, you can not send your contact ANY more messages until they click on the confirmation link.

If it’s important for you to get detailed reports on opens and click-throughs, CC comes ahead of Aweber again. CC offers a very detailed report on how many people were sent an email, how many (and which ones) were opened, who click on which links, and how many times, who forwarded your email to a friend, etc. Aweber (in its basic package) offers limited reporting capabilities, to get the similar reporting to Constant Contact’s you need to upgrade your account.

If you’re looking for a system to easily create and send email newsletters and e-flyers, consider MadMimi instead of Constant Contact, as it’s much easier to use, at about half the price.

For a full-featured, yet easy to use auto-responder and newsletter publishing system I know use and recommend iContact.

Read more on: Boris Recommends / E-newsletter Publishing / Email Delivery Best Practices / Email Design / Email List Building / Email List Management / Email Marketing / Email Service Providers / Tracking Email Opens / Tracking and Split Testing
  • Share/Bookmark

Comments

Tom Bianco Jul 24, 2009

The biggest difference is Aweber has a sequential email auto-responder built in and Constant contact does not. You do not have to re-opt-in your lists with aweber you just need to call them and they will walk you thorough it.

Tom, thanks for dropping by, I hope you come back often.

Last time I used Aweber, they not only forced me to re-confirm my client’s members list, but also forced us to do the same when we wanted to simply split the list (of already Aweber-confirmed subscribers) into two categories.

Their response was they needed to keep track of each sign up to each list. Funnily enough, they allow you to broadcast a message to several lists at the same time, which, to me, defeats the purpose of enforcing such strict list sign up procedures.

They may have changed their policies since then, so I can’t say that this is the case today.

As for your first comment, Constant Contact does now offer an auto-responder, but believe you’re limited to just one.

hey thanks. Great info on Mad Mimi. Seems to be the best choice of all.

I just signed up for Mad Miim through your affilate link. Freebie version for now, hope you get paid when I upgrade.

Ruth Apr 18, 2010

I’m a very green beginner here in the world of email marketing. For the most part, I see my “marketing” more as education-sharing. At any rate, I’ve got a list of about 500 current/former /prospective clients, students, colleagues and interested others and am envisioning sending a maximum of one email letter a month. I’d like a service that is easy to use, affordable, and will give me some feedback re which emails go through, which addresses are defunct, which mail is opened (or not.)
You seem to recommend both madmimi and icontact. I wonder which you might recommend for someone like me?
thanks in advance!

Sorry for the late response, Ruth, I just found your comment in the spam folder.

Regardless of the list size, but taking into consideration all the other factors you mentioned, I’d say MadMimi wins for ease of use and simplicity. Throw in the best customer support service and you can’t miss going with Mimi. At only $8/month for up to 500 contacts it’s as close to a free lunch as you can get.

Leave a comment

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed.

This is the TrackBack URI to this entry.